Verticals
Features
Hudson Technology Systems is a technology company and not a bank. Banking services provided by our partners or customers. Hudson Technology Systems LLC © 2026. All Rights Reserved.
If you are researching ZSuite alternatives, you are probably a community or regional bank with attorney trust money on your balance sheet — IOLTA and IOLA accounts, escrow for title and 1031, security deposits.
ZSuite Technologies is the most widely deployed modern platform for that job, and it earned the position. It spun out of Leader Bank in 2019, is now headquartered in the Boston area, and reports more than 150 financial institutions on the platform as of August 2026. It made the Inc. 5000 for a third consecutive year in 2026. The product line is ZEscrow for general escrow and three-party accounts, ZDeposit for tenant security deposits, and ZRent for recurring rent collection.
So why look elsewhere? Usually one of three reasons. Principal disbursement runs through a third-party payments partner rather than your own rails — ZSuite added Onbe for payouts in July 2024, covering virtual cards, ACH, push-to-card and mobile wallets. The architecture is a holding-account model: in ZSuite's own words, the sub-accounts live in ZSuite's system while "the dollars within those subaccounts are in the holding account on your core," which is clean for tracking and less clean when money has to move on a condition. Or your attorney trust book has outgrown "hold and report" — you are doing per-matter disbursement, settlement fan-out, or state-by-state IOLTA remittance at a volume where the interest calculation is the easy part.
Below are the five most realistic alternatives.
Bottom line: Hudson is the closest alternative if the money in your trust and escrow sub-accounts actually has to leave on the terms of an agreement. Agiletics is the path of least procurement resistance for a Jack Henry bank. Montran is the specialist if your escrow book crosses currencies or jurisdictions. Infinant is the choice if escrow is one workload inside a broader partner-banking ambition. And a spreadsheet against your core's master account remains the real incumbent — genuinely adequate for some books, and the single biggest source of audit risk in others.
One thing to confirm with every vendor on this list. Ask who files the 1099s and who screens the beneficiaries. ZSuite does both. Of the alternatives here, only Hudson documents comparable coverage across tax and screening, and Montran is the only other vendor that names IOLTA interest reporting at all.
Best for banks whose attorney trust and escrow relationships require principal to move on the terms of a contract.
Founded in 2020 and based in New York, Hudson sells a virtual account and specialty deposit platform to US banks and credit unions, white-labeled under the bank's brand. It is built on six modules: Virtual Account Management, Contract Intelligence, Payment Processing, a Rules Engine, Approval Workflows, and Client Portals.
The sub-ledger is multi-tier — one master per relationship, unlimited sub-accounts beneath it, each independently tracked and segregated. Sub-accounts are routable, so an inbound settlement payment lands against the right matter rather than being allocated by hand from a pooled account. Three-way reconciliation for fiduciary accounts — firm ledger, bank statement, sum of matter balances — runs continuously, which matters because that is the exact control a state bar compliance review examines.
Where it diverges from ZSuite is money movement and the paperwork around it. Principal disburses from a sub-account across ACH, bulk ACH, Fedwire, check, RCC and eCheck on the bank's own rails, with instant payments through a partner integration — no third-party payments intermediary in the path. The rules engine and contract terms drive execution, so a conditional or milestone release fires without someone keying it. Contract Intelligence ingests the escrow agreement, property management agreement or loan document and generates the entities, sub-accounts and payment triggers from its terms. On the compliance side, Hudson covers 1099 generation and state bar remittance alongside OFAC, KYC, KYB and AML screening.
Deployment is SaaS on AWS with SOC 2 attestation and a dedicated instance per customer, built on Salesforce. It connects to any core via API and can sit behind an existing digital banking front end.
ZSuite vs. Hudson — and the trade-offs. ZSuite is ahead on deployed footprint: 150+ institutions against Hudson's smaller live base, plus distribution through the Fiserv AppMarket and a COCC partnership announced October 23, 2024. Hudson is ahead on native disbursement, on deriving payment rules from an ingested agreement, and on the depth of state-by-state trust compliance tooling. If your trust book is held and statements, ZSuite's track record is the safer buy. If it is payouts, consider Hudson.
Best for banks already on a Jack Henry contract, where procurement friction is close to zero.
Agiletics was founded in 1987 in Florida and acquired by Jack Henry on October 1, 2018 — terms undisclosed, reported by market data providers at about $7.6 million. It is still sold today as the JHA Agiletics Escrow System and still appears in Jack Henry's most recent published Technology Guide for Banks (© 2024), marketed as core-agnostic and available to all banks regardless of platform.
The functional depth in US statutory escrow types is the reason it belongs on an IOLTA list. Jack Henry documents ten escrow types, and attorney/trust is called out explicitly as covering both IOLTA and IOLA — alongside landlord/tenant, title company, pre-need deposit, resident care, surrogate, developer, real estate, municipalities and government funds, and 1031 exchanges. Interest handling covers special regulatory and conditional accrual with state-specific processing requirements. Reporting includes statements, exportable history, BAI interface files, and federal tax withholding reports. Clients add, edit, close, reopen and delete their own sub-accounts and transfer funds to and from the master through a branded portal.
ZSuite vs. Agiletics — and the trade-offs. Agiletics wins on procurement for a Jack Henry bank, on nearly forty years of accumulated state-specific escrow rule handling. However, ZSuite is far more advanced in architecture, implementation timeline, tax filing and screening.
Best for banks whose escrow book crosses currencies or jurisdictions.
Montran is a privately held payments and securities infrastructure vendor that has operated from New York since its inception, with more than 45 years building national payment rails — 500-plus mission-critical installations across more than 90 countries, ten live instant payment systems, and 75-plus central banks and clearing institutions among its clients. Escrow Services is one module in a broad catalog, built on its Virtual Account Management platform.
It earns a place on an IOLTA list for one specific reason: Montran explicitly claims to simplify IOLA/IOLTA interest capitalisation and payment and to provide regulatory reporting — a claim almost no other virtual account vendor makes at all. The escrow module runs unlimited sub-accounts out of a single omnibus or pooled account with strict segregation, allocates incoming funds automatically to the correct client account, handles automated fee processing and deduction, verifies balances before executing a payment, and raises dynamic alerts on non-receipt, excess and partial payments. Named escrow types include trust accounts, litigation accounts, property transactions, 1031 exchanges, paying agents, syndicated finance control, bid contract management, and care and funeral services. Virtual IBAN management is native, in both one-way and two-way configurations, and the platform is multi-currency throughout. ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, available SaaS or on-premise.
ZSuite vs. Montran — and the trade-offs. Montran has far more payments pedigree than ZSuite — this is a company that builds the rails other vendors connect to — and it addresses multi-currency and multi-jurisdiction escrow that ZSuite does not attempt. What it does not publish is the US-specific half. No Nacha ACH, Fedwire, FedNow or check disbursement is named anywhere in its escrow, VAM or banking pages; its payment execution story is SWIFT, SEPA, local clearing and VIBAN. Its connectivity list leads with secure file transfer before APIs, and there are no named integrations with FIS, Fiserv or Jack Henry. There are no published US bank escrow customers, no case studies, and no review-site presence to check. Treat the US gaps as absence of published evidence rather than confirmed absence — but ask directly, because a $2B community bank running a domestic core is not this vendor's center of gravity.
Best for banks where escrow is one workload inside a broader partner-banking program.
Infinant is a Charlotte, NC company that closed a $15M Series A led by FINTOP Capital and JAM FINTOP BankTech, announced December 23, 2024, and runs a small, heavily engineering-weighted team. Its Interlace platform is a cloud-native layer above a bank's legacy core, and it has listed escrow, 1031 exchanges, IOLTAs, HSAs, insurance, HOAs and property management among supported account structures.
The payments story is genuinely strong and should not be dismissed. Infinant runs secure infrastructure to the Federal Reserve covering ACH, wire and FedNow, is a certified Visa Third Party Agent for card issuing, and has built-in KYC, KYB, AML and transaction monitoring. Named bank customers include Valley Bank and Live Oak Bank (both October 2025) and Legend Bank (December 2024). In January 2026 it shipped tokenized deposits and GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoin issuance, with Vantage Bank named in a stablecoin consortium alongside Custodia.
ZSuite vs. Infinant — and the trade-offs. Infinant is ahead of ZSuite on rails and on platform breadth. It is behind on escrow workflow: it supports the account types without shipping the packaged vertical product, and nothing in its materials covers 1099 filing, per-state IOLTA remittance, or conditional disbursement logic. There is no check disbursement anywhere in its site or developer docs, which matters for title, escrow and attorney trust clients who still need paper. And on architecture, Infinant's own current developer documentation is explicit: each virtual account gets a unique account number, but the routing number belongs to the settlement account that resides on the bank's core. Payments are tagged to the virtual account and clear through the settlement account, with end-of-day settlement to the bank's GL, same as ZSuite.
Best for small, static trust books — and the option most banks are actually running today.
This belongs on the list because it is the real incumbent. Most banks administering attorney trust sub-accounts are doing it with a master account on the core, a spreadsheet as the sub-ledger, manually calculated interest allocations, tax forms prepared in-house, and reconciliation done by a person comparing statements. It costs nothing in licence fees, requires no implementation, adds no vendor to your risk register, and gives you complete control over every calculation.
When it is adequate. A small number of sub-accounts — dozens rather than hundreds. Static holds where funds arrive once and sit. A single uniform rate. One or two law firm relationships rather than a product line. Low turnover, so institutional knowledge stays in the building. If that is your book, a 90-day implementation is a poor use of the year.
Where it breaks, in roughly the order banks discover it. Staff time scales linearly with sub-accounts, so growth is capped by headcount rather than demand — and the deposits you cannot win never show up on a budget line. Per-beneficiary interest allocation and 1099 preparation at volume is error-prone in a way that stays invisible until someone disputes a figure. IOLTA compounds this: most states set a comparability requirement, and California's Established Compliance Rate is 68% of the federal funds target rate or 0.68%, whichever is higher, with remittance reports due monthly or quarterly by the 10th in a prescribed format. Multiply that by every state your law firm clients practise in. OFAC screening of beneficiaries is either not happening or happening manually against a list someone remembers to refresh. And there is key-person risk: the spreadsheet has an author, and the control environment is that person's memory.
ZSuite vs. spreadsheets. ZSuite's value proposition is aimed squarely at this option rather than at other software: self-service so clients open their own sub-accounts, automated interest and statements, daily OFAC, and 1099 filing on your behalf, on a 120-day average implementation. If you are moving off spreadsheets and your book is holds rather than payouts, ZSuite is a strong and well-proven option. Look at the other four only if you are also solving for disbursement, programmability, or non-US regimes.
If the principal has to leave your trust and escrow sub-accounts regularly — and especially if it should leave on the terms of an agreement rather than because someone keyed it — that is Hudson's territory. On a Jack Henry core with a marginal business case, Agiletics is already close to paid for, though the Victor acquisition makes the roadmap question worth asking out loud. For escrow that crosses currencies or jurisdictions, Montran. For a bank where escrow is one line in a partner-banking strategy, Infinant. And if you are running a few dozen static sub-accounts on a spreadsheet with no growth constraint, the most useful thing this page can tell you is that you probably do not need to buy anything yet.
Sources: ZSuite Technologies; Jack Henry & Associates investor relations, product pages and Peapack-Gladstone case study; Montran; Infinant; State Bar of California Financial Institutions and Banking Compliance; Fiserv AppMarket; COCC.
Book a discovery call to learn how escrow products create new revenue streams and elevate consumer trust.
